[mail-vet-discuss] Proposed "header.b" tag for DKIM signatures

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at cloudmark.com
Wed Mar 24 14:52:33 PDT 2010

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike at mtcc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:48 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: mail-vet-discuss at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Proposed "header.b" tag for DKIM
> signatures
> Again, I'm not disputing the theoretical problem -- after all as you
> mention I
> pointed it out ages ago :) All I'm really asking is whether this is
> actually
> causing heartburn for people using auth-res. Like, is there some
> automatons
> that depend on auth-res that are puking because of the situations you
> describe
> above?

No, there's no great urgency here.  I'm being pre-emptive based on some other related efforts, and this has generally not been seen (so far) to be a heavyweight change or anything controversial.

More information about the mail-vet-discuss mailing list