[mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

I tend to support Doug but havnt had the inclination to post much.

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc
404-847-6397



-----Original Message-----
From: mail-vet-discuss-bounces at mipassoc.org on behalf of Lisa Dusseault
Sent: Fri 1/9/2009 3:48 PM
To: Douglas Otis
Cc: mail-vet-discuss at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header
 
Hi Doug, 

Does anybody support your review of sender-auth-header, to the point of believing that the document should not be published?  So far you are still very much in the rough part of rough consensus.  

thanks,
Lisa


On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org> wrote:


	Murray,
	
	There has been progress, but a few extremely critical security related
	areas still need to be addressed.
	
	I have posted a draft that reviews the sender-auth-header draft.
	
	The text and html versions are available at:
	
	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.txt
	http://www.sonic.net/~dougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html <http://www.sonic.net/%7Edougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html> 
	
	-Doug
	_______________________________________________
	NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html