[mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header

Lisa Dusseault lisa.dusseault at gmail.com
Fri Jan 9 12:48:20 PST 2009


Hi Doug,

Does anybody support your review of sender-auth-header, to the point of
believing that the document should not be published?  So far you are still
very much in the rough part of rough consensus.

thanks,
Lisa

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org> wrote:

> Murray,
>
> There has been progress, but a few extremely critical security related
> areas still need to be addressed.
>
> I have posted a draft that reviews the sender-auth-header draft.
>
> The text and html versions are available at:
>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.txt
> http://www.sonic.net/~dougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html<http://www.sonic.net/%7Edougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html>
>
> -Doug
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/mail-vet-discuss/attachments/20090109/7b55d47b/attachment.html 


More information about the mail-vet-discuss mailing list