[mail-vet-discuss] auth-results -12 posted, dkim-reporting is next

[Michael Adkins]

I would be interested in seeing the new version.

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>   
>> This is the review from the IETF's security directorate.  The -11 
>> draft was submitted last week but hasn't yet been posted by the 
>> secretariat. The results of this report will be worked into the 
>> document and a -12 draft produced, and that's the one that will go to 
>> IETF last call before handoff to the Area Director.
>>     
>
> The -12 draft has been posted.  I'm just waiting for the final OK from 
> the security directorate before doing a formal last-call and the handoff.
>
> At MAAWG in San Francisco last week, there was keen interest in working 
> on my DKIM reporting proposal (draft-kucherawy-dkim-reporting) which is 
> currently at a -01 revision.  I worked some of the feedback I got from 
> there into an -02 version and submitted it but I'm not sure I made the 
> IETF's pre-conference deadline (a few hours ago) so it may not be 
> visible for a couple of weeks.
>
> Unless Dave objects, I'm going to use this venue to discuss that 
> proposal as well.  Feel free to begin the conversation if there's 
> anything in there that is of interest.  I can also post the -02 draft 
> here if people want to see what changed before it's posted by the 
> secretariat.
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/mail-vet-discuss/attachments/20080226/eef8886d/attachment.html