[mail-vet-discuss] "none" as a possible result string?

[SM]

At 17:28 21-01-2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>Someone has asked for "none" to be added as a possible result for an 
>authentication method.  An example use of this might be a message 
>not signed with DKIM, and a DKIM verification agent that wants to be 
>very explicit that it processed the message and that the message was 
>unsigned. One could argue though that this is redundant to 
>"neutral", which we already have, or that the implementor would 
>simply omit to add the header altogether in those cases.

That example falls under neutral currently as there were no errors 
and the agent could not make any positive or negative assessment.

Could the text for "none" be posted?

Regards,
-sm