[mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007

[Dave Crocker]

SM wrote:
> At 20:11 04-09-2007, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>    c) I know there's a third item, but i can't think of it at the moment.
> 
> Are you thinking about diverse implementations and interoperability?

Maybe, although I thought I covered that with other text.


>> I'm inclined to suggest a "Last Request for Comments Prior to 
>> Submission to IETF Standards Process" posting to a few lists.  Ones 
>> that come to mind are:
>>
>>    1.  MAAWG tech list
>>
>>    2.  IETF-822 list
> 
> I would recommend the ietf-822 list.  As there are some SPF examples in 
> the draft, it would be good to have some comments from a SPF list as well.

ack.


> The draft may go through a few more iterations before the Last Call and 
> even then it won't be easy as this is on the Standard Track.

Easy?  IETF?  Never.

Still, diligence and tenacity (assuming they are different) usually are rewarded.

d/

ps. No, I didn't get the last line from a fortune cookie.  Should have, tho.
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net