[mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Sep 4 20:59:06 PDT 2007
> At 20:11 04-09-2007, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> c) I know there's a third item, but i can't think of it at the moment.
> Are you thinking about diverse implementations and interoperability?
Maybe, although I thought I covered that with other text.
>> I'm inclined to suggest a "Last Request for Comments Prior to
>> Submission to IETF Standards Process" posting to a few lists. Ones
>> that come to mind are:
>> 1. MAAWG tech list
>> 2. IETF-822 list
> I would recommend the ietf-822 list. As there are some SPF examples in
> the draft, it would be good to have some comments from a SPF list as well.
> The draft may go through a few more iterations before the Last Call and
> even then it won't be easy as this is on the Standard Track.
Easy? IETF? Never.
Still, diligence and tenacity (assuming they are different) usually are rewarded.
ps. No, I didn't get the last line from a fortune cookie. Should have, tho.
More information about the mail-vet-discuss