[mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007

[SM]

At 20:11 04-09-2007, Dave Crocker wrote:
>    c) I know there's a third item, but i can't think of it at the moment.

Are you thinking about diverse implementations and interoperability?

>I'm inclined to suggest a "Last Request for Comments Prior to 
>Submission to IETF Standards Process" posting to a few lists.  Ones 
>that come to mind are:
>
>    1.  MAAWG tech list
>
>    2.  IETF-822 list

I would recommend the ietf-822 list.  As there are some SPF examples 
in the draft, it would be good to have some comments from a SPF list as well.

The draft may go through a few more iterations before the Last Call 
and even then it won't be easy as this is on the Standard Track.

Regards,
-sm