[mail-vet-discuss] A-R hostnames, was message New draft for review

[John Levine]

>Stepping back for a moment...is there any reason that the identifier 
>can't be 'icannhascheezburger' or some other nonsense, so long as the 
>internal network (and perhaps MUAs which connect to that internal 
>network) knows what to look for?

Within a given network the identifier doesn't matter, but I think it'd
be a good idea if the identifiers applied by different networks didn't
collide so my gateway scenario will work.

Something similar to the rules for generating a Message-ID should do
the trick, the name can be arbitrary so long as it's in a domain you
control.

R's,
John