[mail-vet-discuss] Re: Auth-Results issues? #8 secton 5.1

J.D. Falk jdfalk at yahoo-inc.com
Fri Apr 21 14:04:37 PDT 2006

On 2006-04-20 10:51, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> SM wrote:
>> You could have:
>> 5.1.  Legacy MUAs
>>    Implementors of this proposal should be aware that many MUAs are
>>    unlikely to be retrofit to support the new header and its semantics.
>>    As there is keen interest in conveying the results of sender 
>> authentication
>>    tests to legacy MUAs, other interim means of doing so may be 
>> necessary while
>>    this proposal is adopted.
> I'm okay with that wording.  Tony/others?

Perhaps add another sentence: "Care must be taken, however, to avoid 
unnecessarily confusing users by adding entirely new meaning to existing 
MUA features."

J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team

More information about the mail-vet-discuss mailing list