[mail-vet-discuss] Re: Auth-Results issues? #8 secton 5.1
jdfalk at yahoo-inc.com
Fri Apr 21 14:04:37 PDT 2006
On 2006-04-20 10:51, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> SM wrote:
>> You could have:
>> 5.1. Legacy MUAs
>> Implementors of this proposal should be aware that many MUAs are
>> unlikely to be retrofit to support the new header and its semantics.
>> As there is keen interest in conveying the results of sender
>> tests to legacy MUAs, other interim means of doing so may be
>> necessary while
>> this proposal is adopted.
> I'm okay with that wording. Tony/others?
Perhaps add another sentence: "Care must be taken, however, to avoid
unnecessarily confusing users by adding entirely new meaning to existing
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
More information about the mail-vet-discuss