[mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issues? #2 headerspec

Arvel Hathcock arvel.hathcock at altn.com
Tue Mar 28 12:59:58 PST 2006

 > This document can certainly provide an initial registration for
 > specific authentication mechanisms already published as RFCs and
 > deployed. So it can and probably should provide a registration for
 > SMTP AUTH. I guess it could/should also define them for mechanisms
 > that are in the rfc-editor's queue, so that covers SPF and SenderID.
 > We could also consider this spec to be the place where the DKIM method
 > should be defined, but that's unclear. I don't know at this point
 > *where* the DKIM method will be defined otherwise.
 > All of this would be in the IANA Considerations section.

Got it, thanks!  In this case all the methods you suggested are viable 
and I can go with any of them.  I think option (1) should be preserved 
in any case.


More information about the mail-vet-discuss mailing list