[mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issue #4 method=value values
Arvel Hathcock
arvel.hathcock at altn.com
Wed Mar 22 19:30:40 PST 2006
Wow, this is the most feedback I think I've seen for auth-results. It's
excellent. I remain a strong supporter of this concept. I hope to go
through all these posts in detail ASAP.
--
Arvel
Tony Hansen wrote:
> These comments are about the values specified for the method=value:
> pass, fail, softfail, neutral, temperror and permerror.
>
> First pass:
> sending domain publishes an authentication policy of some kind,
> and the message passed the authentication tests
>
> Why is a policy being required? Not all methods have policies, and some
> methods can be used without a published policy.
>
> Instead say something like
>
> The message passed the authentication tests. (This may require
> accessing an authentication policy of some kind published by the
> sending domain.)
>
> The same comments go for fail:
> sending domain publishes an authentication policy of some kind,
> and the message failed the authentication tests
>
> Instead say something like
>
> The message failed the authentication tests. (This may require
> accessing an authentication policy of some kind published by the
> sending domain.)
>
> The other value definitions are different, but need to recognize that
> not all authentication methods require policies. I'd suggest this rewording:
> softfail
> The authentication method requires a policy to be accessed, but
> the policy does not require authentication of all messages from
> that domain, and the message failed the authentication tests
>
> neutral
> The authentication method requires a policy to be accessed, but
> the sending domain does not publish any sender authentication
> policy.
>
> temperror
> A temporary (recoverable) error occurred attempting to
> authenticate the sender; either the process couldn't be
> completed locally because of some transient condition, or (for
> methods requiring a policy to be accessed) there was a temporary
> failure retrieving the sending domain's policy; a later attempt
> to re-authenticate this message might produce a more final
> result.
>
> permerror
> a permanent (unrecoverable) error occurred attempting to
> authenticate the sender; either the process couldn't be
> completed locally, or (for methods requiring a policy to be
> accessed) there was a permanent failure retrieving the sending
> domain's policy.
>
>
> Tony Hansen
> tony at att.com
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
More information about the mail-vet-discuss
mailing list