[ietf-dkim] Draft on email transition to IPv6 from IPv4 for sevice providers and other communities

[Hector Santos]

Section 11 reference DKIM for Domain Authentication.  Something about 
white-listing the big guys.

I am thinking $$$ here.  Big Guys need to pay me to white list them.



Mark Delany wrote:
> On 22Jul11, O'Reirdan, Michael allegedly wrote:
>> Chaps
>>
>> I would like to bring to your attention and solicit comments on the following draft.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html//draft-oreirdan-rosenwald-ipv6mail-transition-00
> 
> Hi Mike. On first glance it doesn't look like much of this document is
> relevant to DKIM or vice versa. This is unsurprising since DKIM has
> little to do with IP addresses.
> 
> On a non-DKIM related front, your document talks about "connection
> exhaustion" as a consequence of the increased address space with
> IPV6. I would have thought the maximum number of connections is a
> function of the number of clients (malicious or otherwise) rather than
> the address space they use. Are you anticipating a larger number of
> new SMTP clients as a consequence of IPV6?
> 
> 
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
> 
> 

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com