[ietf-dkim] Pete's review of 4871bis
dhc at dcrocker.net
Wed Jun 29 11:55:36 PDT 2011
On 6/29/2011 11:49 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Now*that's* the attack. But it's NOT AN ATTACK ON DKIM! It's an attack
The original directive to produce a threats analaysis was for threats to
recipients that DKIM might help remedy.
Clearly, techniques later designed to circumvent or exploit DKIM weaknessare
also relevant, but they aren't the only attacks that are relevant here. Also,
I'm just guessing that that's what you mean by "attack on DKIM".
If I missed it, I apologize, but have you define what you mean by "attack on
DKIM"? And why is it important to distinguish which category an attack falls into?
More information about the ietf-dkim