[ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations
vesely at tana.it
Sat May 28 09:29:23 PDT 2011
On 27/May/11 19:16, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'm all for including experimental code in future releases of our
> stuff, especially if it's an experiment other implementations are
> trying. But I need to see a spec first, or enough detail that I
> could write one.
For the body, I brought some ideas. For MIME header fields,
punctuation and boundaries need to be omitted as well. For other
header fields, including the DKIM-Signature, it is probably enough to
remove just any white space.
IMHO, the "hard parts" of the code are (i) selecting a MIME parser,
and (ii) finding a good way to structure experimental C14Ns and handle
double (triple?) signatures in the existing code.
More information about the ietf-dkim