[ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations
vesely at tana.it
Fri May 27 10:11:30 PDT 2011
On 25/May/11 18:42, Hector Santos wrote:
> Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Yes, dot is one of the punctuation characters that should be removed.
> This turned out to be a bug in our beta code, revamped to support I/O
> completion ports and the code for undotting of the leading dot (per
> RFC5321 4.5.2) fell thru the crack. So we can nix this one. :)
Yet, it wouldn't have hurt if those signatures had passed.
More information about the ietf-dkim