[ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations

[Alessandro Vesely]

On 25/May/11 18:42, Hector Santos wrote:
> Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Yes, dot is one of the punctuation characters that should be removed.
> 
> This turned out to be a bug in our beta code, revamped to support I/O 
> completion ports and the code for undotting of the leading dot (per 
> RFC5321 4.5.2) fell thru the crack.  So we can nix this one. :)

Yet, it wouldn't have hurt if those signatures had passed.