[ietf-dkim] DKIM and mailing lists

[Hector Santos]

Barry Leiba wrote:
>> Change that stupid section 2. background last paragraph to one tells
>> the "truth" and it is 100% compatibility with everyone needs,
> 
> It's unnecessary and unwelcome to call what other people 
> write "stupid".
>

I can see where calling it stupid is unwelcome.

> It's also the case that while you think it doesn't "tell the truth",
> it seems to me that everything in that paragraph is an accurate
> assessment of what's in the DKIM base spec, and agrees with rough
> consensus of the working group.

I don't agree, it is technically incorrect with false conclusions that 
is unmatched anyway else and if that wasn't true than you won't need 
any discussions regarding Author Domains for this document for that 
matter.

After all, that was the original purpose of this MLM I-D effort when 
many people had express concerns with the MLM/DKIM conflicts and lack 
of respect for ADSP and me showing real examples for the 
interoperability problem - it was only then that gave life to this 
document.

Rough consensus in the group really doesn't match the many concerns 
over the years with this issue and its unfortunate they aren't around 
anymore to express their input.

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com