[ietf-dkim] Issue: Consider deprecating "l="
jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org
Tue May 10 07:41:26 PDT 2011
On May 9, 2011, at 5:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I think it was a mistake to include l= in the first place, but I
> find Murray's arguments against taking it out now persuasive.
Agreed (which is a -1 to removal.)
> I would also really like to have a better idea of how people are
> using it, notably, for all those messages where l= doesn't cover
> the whole body, what's in the naked part.
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
More information about the ietf-dkim