[ietf-dkim] Issue: Consider deprecating "l="

[J.D. Falk]

On May 9, 2011, at 5:14 PM, John Levine wrote:

> I think it was a mistake to include l= in the first place, but I
> find Murray's arguments against taking it out now persuasive.

Agreed (which is a -1 to removal.)

> I would also really like to have a better idea of how people are
> using it, notably, for all those messages where l= doesn't cover
> the whole body, what's in the naked part.

Agreed.

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions