[ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

[Jeff Macdonald]

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>> 1.  State principals that are specific to the content of the draft and that
>> give guidance about the scope and boundaries of what should be covered.
>>
>> 2.  Make specific suggestions for specific bits of text in the draft.
>
> Despite the valiant work that Murray has put into the MLM document, my
> preference, which I doubt has any hope of gaining consensus, would be to
> throw it away and replace it by one page that says
>
> a) many lists break signatures, which isn't going to stop
>
> b) so it would be nice if they signed their mail on the way out.
>
> Everything else is either too marginal to be worth worrying about, or not
> a problem if a list's mail has a credible signature.*
>
> Failing that, I don't see small changes making it any better, so just ship
> it.


+1

-- 
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA