[ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

[MH Michael Hammer (5304)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 2:02 PM
> To: Dave CROCKER
> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was
> Output
> 
> > 1.  State principals that are specific to the content of the draft
> and that
> > give guidance about the scope and boundaries of what should be
> covered.
> >
> > 2.  Make specific suggestions for specific bits of text in the
draft.
> 
> Despite the valiant work that Murray has put into the MLM document, my
> preference, which I doubt has any hope of gaining consensus, would be
> to
> throw it away and replace it by one page that says
> 
> a) many lists break signatures, which isn't going to stop
> 
> b) so it would be nice if they signed their mail on the way out.
> 
> Everything else is either too marginal to be worth worrying about, or
> not
> a problem if a list's mail has a credible signature.*
> 
> Failing that, I don't see small changes making it any better, so just
> ship
> it.
> 

+1