[ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

Barry Leiba barryleiba at computer.org
Sat May 7 06:01:23 PDT 2011


>> So if we wish to discourage "l=" useful, some of these text needs to
>> be reworded, like this one in section 3.5 [...]
>
> I don't think the proposed text adds or clarifies anything that isn't already there.
> The semantics and use of "l=" are pretty well defined already.

I agree.

Barry, as participant



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list