[ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain Identity"

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at cloudmark.com
Sun May 1 18:36:29 PDT 2011


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:51 PM
> To: Michael Thomas
> Cc: dcrocker at bbiw.net; ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain Identity"
> 
> Its just really odd that the we need to hide the facts in RFC4871bis
> but not in RFC5585 (DKIM Architecture) and RFC5863 (DKIM Deployment
> Guideline)?

I've lost track of how many times and how many different ways it's been explained that nothing is being hidden.  I'm going to give up now.

> But in the mean time, implementors are not listening. They are looking
> at other things especially the "author thing" we must burn into the
> signature.

Which implementers, and why aren't they saying anything?




More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list