[ietf-dkim] Output summary

[Charles Lindsey]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:52:19 +0100, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

> Last paragraph of sec 5.2: " Verifiers SHOULD ignore failed signatures as
> though they were not present in the message."

Actually, that does not seem quite right. It is assessors who should do  
that. Verifiers are explicitly asked to report "PERMFAIL" in that case,  
which is not quite the same thing as "ignoring".

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5