[ietf-dkim] Issue: Repeated headers

[J.D. Falk]

On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:55 PM, John R. Levine wrote:

>> I don't want to re-hash all the arguments.  What we have is a compromise between two hard-argued positions, and I think reopening it now will just drag everything out even longer.
> 
> I agree that the current language addresses the issue about as well as it 
> could be addressed, and see no advantage in rearguing it.

+1

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions