[ietf-dkim] [dkim] #11: 2.5 SDID minor nit
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Apr 15 19:05:25 PDT 2011
On 4/15/2011 2:51 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> So the question to me is more like:
I think that that's entirely the wrong question.
For this stage of the document, the questions are:
1) What problems have been documented as being due to this wording?
2) What technical errors does this text clearly represent.
In both cases, the answer for this text is "none".
Hence, no change should be contemplated.
More information about the ietf-dkim