[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: non-ascii header text
hsantos at isdg.net
Wed Apr 13 15:40:02 PDT 2011
Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
>> I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state of IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment intelligently on whether John's proposed text does so.
> as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
> one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs.
> it should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have
> gained adoption.
> anything more than that is attempting to predict the future. in the
> case of internationalized character issues, that's proved
> problematic for at least 20 years...
More information about the ietf-dkim