[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: non-ascii header text

[Hector Santos]

Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
>> I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state of IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment intelligently on whether John's proposed text does so.
> 
> 
> as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
> 
> one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs.  
> it should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have 
> gained adoption.
>
> anything more than that is attempting to predict the future.  in the 
> case of internationalized character issues, that's proved 
> problematic for at least 20 years...

+1.

-- 
HLS