[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: non-ascii header text
jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org
Wed Apr 13 14:17:20 PDT 2011
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
>> I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state of IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment intelligently on whether John's proposed text does so.
> as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
> one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs. it should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have gained adoption.
Yeah, that's a good point. If that work isn't stable yet, it may be better to simply point to the working group.
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
More information about the ietf-dkim