[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

[Charles Lindsey]

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:45:22 +0100, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>  
wrote:

>
> Review the charter exclusions.  There can be no deeper meaning defined
> for the i= field.

But undoubtedly individuals are going to use the field in ways that they  
find useful to their purpose (with knowledge of their own situations). All  
I am trying to say is that the 'i=' tag is not so totally broken that it  
is useless for any pourpose whatever. Hence it should be kept, since it is  
already there and will get used.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5