[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Wed Apr 13 04:19:14 PDT 2011
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:45:22 +0100, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>
> Review the charter exclusions. There can be no deeper meaning defined
> for the i= field.
But undoubtedly individuals are going to use the field in ways that they
find useful to their purpose (with knowledge of their own situations). All
I am trying to say is that the 'i=' tag is not so totally broken that it
is useless for any pourpose whatever. Hence it should be kept, since it is
already there and will get used.
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-dkim