[ietf-dkim] issue: Section 2.3 Evaluation Layer introduction
hsantos at isdg.net
Tue Apr 12 17:37:14 PDT 2011
Hector Santos wrote:
> Fundamentally, we tried to make DKIM-BASE independent of specific
> implementation evaluation methods starting by pulling semantics
> regarding policy.
> However, an evaluation layer for trust was reintroduced in section 2.3.
> 2.3. Identity
> A person, role, or organization. In the context of DKIM, examples
> include the author, the author's organization, an ISP along the
> handling path, an independent trust assessment service, and a mailing
> list operator.
Per Murray request to suggest changes for posted issues, in lieu of
removing the trust assessment layer semantic, a more consistent text
that helps promote implementation synergism for wider deployment
scenarios might be:
A person, role, or organization. In the context of DKIM, examples
include the author, the author's organization, an author
authorized signer or independent trusted signer domain
along the handling path.
If considered, that would be enough for me to give the RFC4871bis last
call a "ready to go" endorsement
More information about the ietf-dkim