[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

[Dave CROCKER]

OK.  So the capability exists, but people choose not to use it.  Some people in 
fact choose to disable this capability; note that a) ADSP is an add-on, not the 
DKIM core, and b) the actual uptake of ADSP on the receive side is not known to 
be large.

So the suggestion is to add a second capability that performs the same function 
as the first, on the theory that, this time, folks will use it for that purpose?

The logic sequence has some problems, but I don't believe it's reflection of the 
current situation is one of them.

d/


On 4/3/2011 10:02 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>> Why doesn't the d= value satisfy this function just as well?
>>
>> Remember that d= can have sub-domains, to distinguish different
>> streams.
>>
>>
> I'll answer: Paypal and ADSP
>
> Yes it can be done, are people doing it: no
>
> people are using their domain name for their corporate email and application, they are not ready to do corp.mydomain.com
>
> http://postmaster.facebook.com/outbound
>
> Facebook is mixing up their corporate email with their users email...
>

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net