[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
franck at genius.com
Sun Apr 3 14:02:49 PDT 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave CROCKER" <dhc at dcrocker.net>
> To: "Franck Martin" <franck at genius.com>
> Cc: "IETF DKIM WG" <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
> Sent: Monday, 4 April, 2011 12:47:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
> On 4/1/2011 10:04 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> > I would suggest we deprecate i= and add st= (if not already used)
> > that would
> > let the sender specify a stream category.
> > With IPv6 we may loose IP reputation, this is a way to bring it back
> > within
> > DKIM.
> Why doesn't the d= value satisfy this function just as well?
> Remember that d= can have sub-domains, to distinguish different
I'll answer: Paypal and ADSP
Yes it can be done, are people doing it: no
people are using their domain name for their corporate email and application, they are not ready to do corp.mydomain.com
Facebook is mixing up their corporate email with their users email...
More information about the ietf-dkim