[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
Franck Martin
franck at genius.com
Sun Apr 3 14:02:49 PDT 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave CROCKER" <dhc at dcrocker.net>
> To: "Franck Martin" <franck at genius.com>
> Cc: "IETF DKIM WG" <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
> Sent: Monday, 4 April, 2011 12:47:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
> On 4/1/2011 10:04 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> > I would suggest we deprecate i= and add st= (if not already used)
> > that would
> > let the sender specify a stream category.
> ...
> > With IPv6 we may loose IP reputation, this is a way to bring it back
> > within
> > DKIM.
>
>
> Why doesn't the d= value satisfy this function just as well?
>
> Remember that d= can have sub-domains, to distinguish different
> streams.
>
>
I'll answer: Paypal and ADSP
Yes it can be done, are people doing it: no
people are using their domain name for their corporate email and application, they are not ready to do corp.mydomain.com
http://postmaster.facebook.com/outbound
Facebook is mixing up their corporate email with their users email...
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list