[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

Michael Thomas mike at mtcc.com
Sat Apr 2 11:49:49 PDT 2011


Dave CROCKER wrote:
> The distinction that needs to be made is between formally-specified output vs. 
> implementation-specific access to DKIM internals.
> 

i= was never intended to be "DKIM internals". That's why the entire gambit to
make d= the only show in town sucked.

Mike


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list