[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-03 submitted

[Barry Leiba]

>>   Therefore, a verifier SHOULD NOT validate a message that is not
>>   compliant with [RFC5322, RFC2045 and RFC2047] specifications.
>>
>>IMHO, it is somewhat vague.  That SHOULD-NOT could be "promoted" to a
>>MUST-NOT for a finite number of specific features --to be explicitly
>>listed for readers' convenience.
>
> I'm pretty sure we already had this argument, and SHOULD NOT was the
> rough consensus.

The chairs are pretty sure that's correct.

Barry, as chair