[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-03 submitted

[John Levine]

>   Therefore, a verifier SHOULD NOT validate a message that is not
>   compliant with [RFC5322, RFC2045 and RFC2047] specifications.
>
>IMHO, it is somewhat vague.  That SHOULD-NOT could be "promoted" to a
>MUST-NOT for a finite number of specific features --to be explicitly
>listed for readers' convenience.

I'm pretty sure we already had this argument, and SHOULD NOT was the
rough consensus.

R's,
John