[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-03 submitted
johnl at iecc.com
Sat Feb 26 07:27:03 PST 2011
> Therefore, a verifier SHOULD NOT validate a message that is not
> compliant with [RFC5322, RFC2045 and RFC2047] specifications.
>IMHO, it is somewhat vague. That SHOULD-NOT could be "promoted" to a
>MUST-NOT for a finite number of specific features --to be explicitly
>listed for readers' convenience.
I'm pretty sure we already had this argument, and SHOULD NOT was the
More information about the ietf-dkim