[ietf-dkim] Do we need to meet in Prague?

[Eliot Lear]

Barry,

I'd suggest that the group is in one of two states:

    * We are sufficiently agreed on 4871bis that it can advance, at
      which point I would ask that we circle back to the DOSETA split,
      and how it relates to other work, and what opportunities there
      are.  I think Dave really posed an interesting idea, and what it
      needs is a good test case.  If we can identify that, then I would
      say we should meet on that point, and consider this from a
      re-charter perspective.
    * If we are not concluded on 4871bis, then we should meet to close
      on open issues.


Thanks,

Eliot

On 1/20/11 10:32 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Does the DKIM working group think it needs a face-to-face meeting in
> Prague, at IETF 81?
>
> I think we do not, though that answer may depend upon whether 4871bis
> is ready or needs more discussion, and whether we think we need
> discussion about the mailing lists document (which Murray has
> patiently been holding off on, while we sort out 4871bis).
>
> Comments?
>
> Barry, as chair
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20110121/868dbd97/attachment.html