[ietf-dkim] Proposed documentation split between DKIM and "DOSETA"
dhc at dcrocker.net
Wed Jan 12 09:10:52 PST 2011
This raise a specific and interesting technical point. I haven't seen a
response so far, so...
On 1/10/2011 3:07 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> I think keys should be able to be based on things other than domain names.
> Names of netnews newgroups in one obvious exception, but there may be many
> situations where the entity claiming authority to certify some document
> may have no obvious relation to a domain.
The core of this technology has keys that are named and accessed in terms of
domain names. It really is fundamental to this technical approach.
It might be possible to define something using another naming and accessing
scheme but it was be a significantly different technical base, IMO.
More information about the ietf-dkim