[ietf-dkim] Re-thinking the organization of the DKIM spec
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Jan 11 10:59:31 PST 2011
On 1/10/2011 5:28 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> 1. Review Abuse: We held a Last Call on rfc4871bis that closed on 22
> October 2010. Many of us put considerable focus into a detailed edit of
> the document at that time, and to hear that other than surgical changes
> to the document in response to Last Call comments is an abuse of many
> peoples' time, and not just mine.
Separate from the larger concerns you raise, I should clarify the specific one
about use of feedback from the Last Call:
The new docs willuse the CORRECTED rfc4871bis text.
In other words, any changes produced from reviews will be in the split documents.
ps. FWIW, iSchedule was offered as an exemplar, not a motivator not a necessary
consumer. iSchedule really had nothing to do with the basis or timing of the
proposed split. Serendipity of input and thinking were responsible...
More information about the ietf-dkim