[ietf-dkim] Re-thinking the organization of the DKIM spec

[Dave CROCKER]

On 1/10/2011 5:28 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> 1. Review Abuse:  We held a Last Call on rfc4871bis that closed on 22
> October 2010.  Many of us put considerable focus into a detailed edit of
> the document at that time, and to hear that other than surgical changes
> to the document in response to Last Call comments is an abuse of many
> peoples' time, and not just mine.


Separate from the larger concerns you raise, I should clarify the specific one 
about use of feedback from the Last Call:

    The new docs willuse the CORRECTED rfc4871bis text.

In other words, any changes produced from reviews will be in the split documents.

d/

ps. FWIW, iSchedule was offered as an exemplar, not a motivator not a necessary 
consumer.  iSchedule really had nothing to do with the basis or timing of the 
proposed split.  Serendipity of input and thinking were responsible...

--

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net