[ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

[Douglas Otis]

On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>  On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> > Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails
> > (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places
> > where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed.
>
>  This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect.
>
>  Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these
>  assertions are correct.

+1