[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 18.104.22.168 - Working with other TXT records
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Wed Oct 20 09:47:02 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 3:52 AM
> To: DKIM
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 22.214.171.124 - Working with other TXT
> >> By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens
> >> if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right
> >> thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private
> >> signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the
> >> moment) wasn't present.
> > OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases.
> And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying?
I'm not sure what you think "both" meant, but I meant it as "when signing and when verifying". I don't know of any other DKIM operating modes.
More information about the ietf-dkim