[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 126.96.36.199 - Working with other TXT records
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Wed Oct 20 03:51:56 PDT 2010
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:06:14 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy
<msk at cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
>> [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
>> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:14 PM
>> To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
>> Cc: dcrocker at bbiw.net
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 188.8.131.52 - Working with other TXT records
>> By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens
>> if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right
>> thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private
>> signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the
>> moment) wasn't present.
> OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases.
And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying?
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-dkim