[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records

[Charles Lindsey]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:06:14 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy  
<msk at cloudmark.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org  
>> [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
>> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:14 PM
>> To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
>> Cc: dcrocker at bbiw.net
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records
>>
>> By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens
>> if there's no From: header at all?  Do we even agree what the right
>> thing is?  I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private
>> signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the
>> moment) wasn't present.
>
> OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases.

And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying?

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5