[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Oct 15 11:19:21 PDT 2010
On 10/15/2010 1:32 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> Dave killfile's
>> many participants, therefore any consensus he sees will merely reflect
>> the echo chamber of his own making.
>> So I strongly object on procedural grounds
> Mike, you needn't object unless the chairs put people in our
> kill-files, and I can assure you that we don't.
(First rule of politics and legal trials: if you can't win on the substance,
try to win on the process.)
Since this is a formal forum and we're in the middle of a formal act (making a
decision) and the mailing list is a formal record, I'm feeling compelled to
correct two factual errors, in spite of the potential for this taking us down
the rabbit hole:
1. I don't killfile.
2. I reviewed all mailing list postings in the thread that followed my query.
ps. However I happen to agree with Barry's note about requirements. But an
inaccurate formal record warranted correcting.
More information about the ietf-dkim