[ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Fri Oct 15 11:03:13 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:48 AM
> To: Hector Santos
> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats
> > -- 25.9% : dkim_body_hash_mismatch
> I was going to ask...
> > I should probably add a recording which of these has List-IDs, but I
> > think the high body hash failures are most list systems.
> ...but you answered.
We do have that recorded. Of 10,561 signatures for which the body hash failed, 8,219 (77.8%) appeared to be list traffic (i.e. had a "List-*" header field or a "Precedence: list" field).
Breaking that down further: Of the 8,219, 6,614 (80.4%) were author domain signatures, so the rest were presumably list signatures (or something else).
57 of them failed even in the presence of an "l=" tag.
More information about the ietf-dkim