[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

[Steve Atkins]

On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:44 PM, John R. Levine wrote:

>>> if for nothing else to ensure that some future DKIM++ doesn't
>>> inadvertently reuse g= to mean something else.
>> 
>> Isn't that what the IANA registry is there to prevent?
> 
> I dunno.  What does IANA do in cases like these?

http://www.iana.org/assignments/dkim-parameters/dkim-parameters.xhtml#dkim-parameters-5

I presume that "g" will never vanish from that table.

Cheers,
  Steve