[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
steve at wordtothewise.com
Thu Oct 14 16:59:40 PDT 2010
On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:44 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>>> if for nothing else to ensure that some future DKIM++ doesn't
>>> inadvertently reuse g= to mean something else.
>> Isn't that what the IANA registry is there to prevent?
> I dunno. What does IANA do in cases like these?
I presume that "g" will never vanish from that table.
More information about the ietf-dkim