[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Oct 14 15:33:20 PDT 2010
On 10/14/2010 6:01 PM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> If we remove g= altogether, then we can remove 22.214.171.124*along* with all
> the other references to g= within the document.
This double removal appears to produce the simplest acceptable result.
I believe we have not seen significant objection to either removal. My sense is
that we are ok to do the double removal, but maybe we haven't seen enough comment.
Although some folk have done a +1 for one (or another) removal, I'd like to get
a round of explicit reactions to the specific idea of removing /both/.
More information about the ietf-dkim