[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

[J.D. Falk]

On Oct 14, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>> I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety.
> 
> Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to 
> DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input to 
> DKIM.
> 
> At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and 
> transition from, DomainKeys was essential.  Now it isn't.

+1

We've done a surprisingly good job of getting the word out that DK is over and DKIM is the future.