[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org
Thu Oct 14 12:24:43 PDT 2010
On Oct 14, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>> I propose removing section 18.104.22.168 in its entirety.
> Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to
> DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input to
> At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and
> transition from, DomainKeys was essential. Now it isn't.
We've done a surprisingly good job of getting the word out that DK is over and DKIM is the future.
More information about the ietf-dkim