[ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:08 AM
> To: IETF DKIM WG
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?
> 
> On 10/14/2010 12:46 AM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> > Another potential option is to remove g= entirely:
> 
> I'd like to encourage our considering this strongly, for two reasons:
> [...]

I'd support this.  Our statistics show that its use other than "g=*" or "g=" with DK back-compatibility is vanishingly small (when I looked last night, 7 out of 300,000 keys retrieved made use of it by actually naming something there).