[ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Thu Oct 14 09:20:37 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:08 AM
> To: IETF DKIM WG
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?
> On 10/14/2010 12:46 AM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> > Another potential option is to remove g= entirely:
> I'd like to encourage our considering this strongly, for two reasons:
I'd support this. Our statistics show that its use other than "g=*" or "g=" with DK back-compatibility is vanishingly small (when I looked last night, 7 out of 300,000 keys retrieved made use of it by actually naming something there).
More information about the ietf-dkim