[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Oct 14 05:09:52 PDT 2010
On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> I propose removing section 184.108.40.206 in its entirety.
Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to
DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input to
At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and
transition from, DomainKeys was essential. Now it isn't.
More information about the ietf-dkim