[ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

[Dave CROCKER]

On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety.

Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to 
DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input to 
DKIM.

At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and 
transition from, DomainKeys was essential.  Now it isn't.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net