[ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt
fenton at cisco.com
Tue Oct 12 09:49:13 PDT 2010
On 10/11/10 11:46 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jim Fenton<fenton at cisco.com> wrote:
>> There's a Working Group Last Call in effect for -01. Should we:
>> - Continue to direct comments at -01
>> - Comment on -02 instead
>> - or will the WGLC be restarted on the -02 draft?
> I think it's not necessary for us to restart, but reviews should now
> go against -02.
Thanks for clarifying.
Dave, could you then update the diffs at
http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-to-bis-diff.htm to show the diffs from -02
to RFC 4871? It would be nice to see all of the differences in one place.
More information about the ietf-dkim