[ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:dhc at dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 6:12 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: DKIM
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-
> mailinglists-03
> 
> I suggest saying "the holder of the message is requested to discard
> it".

That paragraph now reads:

   Use of restrictive domain policies such as [ADSP] "discardable"
   presents an additional challenge.  In that case, when a message is
   unsigned or the signature can no longer be verified, discarding of
   the message is requested.  There is no exception in the policy for a
   message that may have been altered by an MLM, nor is there a reliable
   way to identify such mail.  Receivers are thus advised to honor the
   policy and disallow the message.

Does that work for people?

> I'm not a huge fan of having "pro & con" in a title.
> 
> Perhaps simply:  "Signature Removal Issues".

Done.