[ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Mon Oct 4 19:30:07 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 4:41 PM
> To: DKIM List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
> Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a separate usage report focused
> on 1st/3rd party signing practices may be appropriate -- but I don't
> think it makes sense to hold up the advancement of the DKIM base spec
> for that.
Actually the data are still there. It was just reworded, as per Jeff's suggestion:
Identities: 73.8% of the signatures observed included a "d=" value
matching the domain in the From: field.
...so this is a non-issue.
More information about the ietf-dkim