[ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics

[Hector Santos]

Barry Leiba wrote:
> Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
> interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
> The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.
> 
> This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec
> to Draft Standard.  Everyone please review it, and post
> comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
> it's ready to go.


I have only one comment.  The removal of very significant data points 
from this last revision:

   Author vs. Third-Party:  73% of the signatures observed were author
        signatures, meaning the "d=" value in the signature matched the
        domain found in the From: header field.  The remainder, therefore,
        were third-party signatures.

   Originator signatures:  1.2 billion
   Third-party signatures:  184 million

This is signification information.

Why was it removed?  Why hide this significant fact?


-- 
HLS