[ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics
hsantos at isdg.net
Mon Oct 4 15:02:33 PDT 2010
Barry Leiba wrote:
> Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
> interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
> The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.
> This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec
> to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
> comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
> it's ready to go.
I have only one comment. The removal of very significant data points
from this last revision:
Author vs. Third-Party: 73% of the signatures observed were author
signatures, meaning the "d=" value in the signature matched the
domain found in the From: header field. The remainder, therefore,
were third-party signatures.
Originator signatures: 1.2 billion
Third-party signatures: 184 million
This is signification information.
Why was it removed? Why hide this significant fact?
More information about the ietf-dkim